seminar:weeks:week1:reading_summary
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| seminar:weeks:week1:reading_summary [2012/09/28 00:45] – brozkeff | seminar:weeks:week1:reading_summary [2012/10/01 00:20] (current) – removed brozkeff | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Reading summary from the study text (Week 1) ====== | ||
| - | Please feel free to contribute here to write or improve a summary from the text you have read. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== The Perennial Philosophy’s Degenerative View of Human Evolution and History ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Keywords and significant quotations: | ||
| - | |||
| - | * We are living in what the Greeks called the " | ||
| - | * According to A. J. Ayer "we are authorized to have faith in our procedure [i.e. scientific method], so long as it carries out its function, which is that of predicting future experience and thus control our environment" | ||
| - | * Sciences are but myths ... Progress is nothing but a myth to the bourgeoisie --Sorel (pp.797; 934=endnote 3) | ||
| - | * there cannot be a perfect structural fit between [digital] conceptual maps and the [analog] territory ... // | ||
| - | * pseudo-postmodernism of petit récits and imperfect deconstruction/ | ||
seminar/weeks/week1/reading_summary.1348785946.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
